Moon Math

Jul. 1st, 2002 01:08 pm
infrogmation: (Default)
[personal profile] infrogmation
Let's see...

Have I got this right? Mathematics never was my strong point...

Cost of Apollo program: $25.4 billion

Amount of moon material brought back by Apollo program: 381.7 kg

25,400,000,000 / 381,700

Works out to about $60,540 spent per gram of moon brought back, no?


Going rate for Apollo moon rock on open market: almost $5million per gram

So if that value held, NASA would have a stockpile of moon with an estimated street value of some $19085 Billion...

(Yes yes, scarcity; I know that if there was more on the market the price would go down... I was just pondering...)

Ejecta

Date: 2002-07-03 10:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sunburn.livejournal.com
Not all moon-rock came to Earth via the Apollo program. A lot of moon rock, as well as a lot of Martian rock, has arrived on Earth after being blasted into space by meteoric impact, and gets swept up by Earth's gravity. You could probably spend quite a lot less than $5 million to fly to Antarctica and get quite a lot more than a gram of the moon, and some Mars on the side. Maybe the value's in the lucite, or maybe the moon-chunk witnessed the missing 18 minutes.

Re: Ejecta

Date: 2002-07-04 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] infrogmation.livejournal.com
IIRC, before actual samples were brought back from the moon for comparison, there was debate in the scientific community as to whether the tektites were from the moon or not.

Also, note that 3 unmanned Russian probes brought back .321 kg of moon. I imagine that robot probes would probably be more cost efficient per gram of moon than manned missions.

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
8 91011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 13th, 2026 04:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios